Breakpoint in particular had “time savers” and season passes that no doubt fed into Ubisoft’s monetary gain.Īnd finally, there’s the latest three installments of the Assassin’s Creed franchise. Both had some very shady practices that encourage players to keep playing or paying by putting in a grind. Even more so with its sequel, Breakpoint, which you couldn’t even play unless you’re online. It’s purposefully designed to keep your attention for as long as possible. Wildlands has this great giant open world map, that’s practically a whole country, that take a while to traverse. Then take a gander at Ghost Recon Wildlands, that was released back in 2017. Just imagine how much they earn with their Season Passes and the in-game market offering cosmetics. This is one of Ubisoft’s greatest sources of income with players encouraged to either pony up money to unlock new operators or invest a great amount of time to get the one they want. A competitive platform released back in 2015 that has amassed a good amount of loyal players that keep coming back to the game. They’re both games designed to keep players playing for as long as possible. What do these two have in common? Simple. They’re either A) a competitive multiplayer game or B) a big sprawling open world map with tons of stuff to do. If we take a look at Ubisoft’s trending releases of games, they follow either one of two practices. Unfortunately for us, don’t bother expecting another Splinter Cell game from Ubisoft. There’s no shortage of frustration for Ubisoft why they would ignore players asking this type of content in favor. Especially one that people have been repeatedly asking for. With such an iconic franchise, one would think that any company would capitalize on such a game. Splinter Cell is undoubtedly one of the most beloved stealth action franchises that ever existed, rivaled only and surpassed by the likes of Metal Gear Solid.

Game splinter cell